United States v. Whitehill, No. 1:14-cv-188-RJA-MJR (W.D.N.Y. May 28, 2019). Settling CWA defendants that discharged pollutants without a permit into waters of the United States and violated an administrative order issued by EPA must restore impacted areas, perform mitigation, and pay a civil penalty.

United States v. Whitehill, No. 1:14-cv-188-RJA-MJR (W.D.N.Y. May 28, 2019). Settling CWA defendants that discharged pollutants without a permit into waters of the United States and violated an administrative order issued by EPA must restore impacted areas, perform mitigation, and pay a civil penalty.

United States v. Whitehill, No. 1:14-cv-188-RJA-MJR (W.D.N.Y. May 28, 2019). Settling CWA defendants that discharged pollutants without a permit into waters of the United States and violated an administrative order issued by EPA must restore impacted areas, perform mitigation, and pay a civil penalty.

United States v. Whitehill, No. 1:14-cv-188-RJA-MJR (W.D.N.Y. May 28, 2019). Settling CWA defendants that discharged pollutants without a permit into waters of the United States and violated an administrative order issued by EPA must restore impacted areas, perform mitigation, and pay a civil penalty.

United States v. Whitehill, No. 1:14-cv-188-RJA-MJR (W.D.N.Y. May 28, 2019). Settling CWA defendants that discharged pollutants without a permit into waters of the United States and violated an administrative order issued by EPA must restore impacted areas, perform mitigation, and pay a civil penalty.

EPA entered into a proposed consent decree under the CAA that resolves a lawsuit filed against the Agency concerning Alaska's SIP submission; the proposed consent decree would require EPA to determine by July 8, 2019, whether Alaska made an administratively complete SIP submission that meets the serious nonattainment area plan requirements for the Fairbanks North State Borough 2006 24-hour fine particulate matter nonattainment area.

EPA entered into a proposed consent decree under the CAA that resolves a lawsuit filed against the Agency concerning Alaska's SIP submission; the proposed consent decree would require EPA to determine by July 8, 2019, whether Alaska made an administratively complete SIP submission that meets the serious nonattainment area plan requirements for the Fairbanks North State Borough 2006 24-hour fine particulate matter nonattainment area.

EPA entered into a proposed consent decree under the CAA that resolves a lawsuit filed against the Agency concerning Alaska's SIP submission; the proposed consent decree would require EPA to determine by July 8, 2019, whether Alaska made an administratively complete SIP submission that meets the serious nonattainment area plan requirements for the Fairbanks North State Borough 2006 24-hour fine particulate matter nonattainment area.

EPA entered into a proposed consent decree under the CAA that resolves a lawsuit filed against the Agency concerning Alaska's SIP submission; the proposed consent decree would require EPA to determine by July 8, 2019, whether Alaska made an administratively complete SIP submission that meets the serious nonattainment area plan requirements for the Fairbanks North State Borough 2006 24-hour fine particulate matter nonattainment area.

EPA entered into a proposed consent decree under the CAA that resolves a lawsuit filed against the Agency concerning Alaska's SIP submission; the proposed consent decree would require EPA to determine by July 8, 2019, whether Alaska made an administratively complete SIP submission that meets the serious nonattainment area plan requirements for the Fairbanks North State Borough 2006 24-hour fine particulate matter nonattainment area.