Toward Better Bubbles and Future Lives: A Progressive Response to the Conservative Agenda for Reforming Environmental Law
Gridlock and Its Implications
Gridlock and Its Implications
Coal combustion is the leading source of industrial air pollution in China today, contributing up to 87% of total sulfur dioxide (SO2) emissions and 75% of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions.1 In 2001, 46% of total SO2 emissions stemmed from power plants alone.2 These emissions in turn contribute heavily to acid rain, smog, and climate change both within China and around the world, causing severe damage to human health and natural ecosystems.3
The U.S. Supreme Court's Chevron, U.S.A., Inc.
When society recognizes a need that can be satisfied through advanced education or research and when sufficient funds are available to pay the cost, American universities respond in exemplary fashion. . . . On the other hand, when social needs are not clearly recognized and backed by adequate financial support, higher education has often failed to respond as effectively as it might, even to some of the most important challenges facing America . . . .
With no fanfare, and indeed with hardly much public notice, agrarianism is again on the rise. In small corners and pockets, in ways for the most part unobtrusive, people are reinvigorating their ties to the land, both in their practical modes of living and in the ways that they think about themselves, their communities, and the good life. Agrarianism, broadly conceived, reaches beyond food production and rural living to include a wide constellation of ideas, loyalties, sentiments, and hopes.
The timing of environmental analysis and judicial review presents critical issues of interpretation under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). Courts must be able to review an agency's compliance with NEPA before the agency makes major decisions, and before it invests significant resources that can compromise environmental review. Agencies must not be allowed to delay environmental review just because necessary data and research are difficult to obtain, or environmental impacts are uncertain. This Article discusses how the courts have handled these timing problems.
On May 16, 2000, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing (3M) Company announced its intention to voluntarily phase out its perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS)-based line of products from the global chemical market.1 This announcement surprised many in the industry, as 3M had manufactured PFOS-based products such as Scotchgard TM for nearly 40 years.2 In its press release, 3M executives indicated their decision was based on their pursuit of responsible environmental management.3 However, while the scientific information av
Advances in genomics, the study of the structure and function of our genetic make-up, are fundamentally transforming toxicology, the science of how toxic substances affect our bodies.
Proponents of "economic incentives" frequently state that emissions trading promotes technological innovation.1 Emissions trading programs authorize polluters to meet pollution reduction obligations by purchasing extra reductions from polluters reducing their emissions below applicable limits. This Article examines the claim that this trading of compliance obligations fosters innovation.
The worth of education must now be measured against the standards of decency and human survival—the issues now looming so large before us in the 21st century. It is not education, but education of a certain kind, that will save us.1
—David Orr