89 FR 13622
SIP Proposal: Oregon (regional haze).
SIP Proposal: Oregon (regional haze).
United States v. Navistar, Inc., No. 1:24-cv-00285 (S.D. Ind. Feb. 13, 2024). Under a proposed consent decree, settling CERCLA defendants must reimburse the United States for response costs and are liable for future response costs regarding the release and threatened release of hazardous substances from a former waste oil collection, storage, and transfer facility in Indianapolis, Indiana.
SIP Proposal: Ohio (reinstatement of air nuisance rule).
SIP Proposal: Virginia (amendment to include a newly designated sulfur dioxide nonattainment area).
EPA seeks public input on potential charge questions that the Agency could consider when consulting the e-Manifest Advisory Board regarding the operations of EPA's hazardous waste electronic manifest system.
SIP Proposal: Pennsylvania (disapproval of revisions to address certain reasonably available control technology requirements for the 1997 and 2008 ozone NAAQS for the Keystone, Conemaugh and Homer City electric generating facilities).
United States v. Toa Alta, Puerto Rico, Municipality of, No. 3:21-01087 (D.P.R. Feb. 13, 2024). A proposed second stipulation and final order resolves two claims under RCRA and requires a settling defendant to remove and dispose of leachate in the Toa Alta landfill’s southeast cell and to pay a $50,000 civil penalty.
EPA proposed to approve a request from the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection for the delegation of authority to implement and enforce the federal plan requirements for municipal solid waste landfills that commenced construction on or before July 17, 2014.
EPA entered into a proposed cost recovery settlement agreement under CERCLA with Jonathan Deck relating to the Frankfort Asbestos Superfund site located in Frankfort, New York.
United States v. Apache Corp., No. 24-cv-00149 (D.N.M. Feb. 13, 2024). Under a proposed consent decree, a settling CAA defendant whose oil and natural gas production facilities in New Mexico and Texas allegedly failed to comply with requirements of the federal new source performance standards must pay a civil penalty of $4,000,000 and perform a project that will offset the excess emissions resulting from the violations.