In re Motors Liquidation Co., No. 09-50026 (REG) (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Dec. 14, 2010). A settling CERCLA defendant responsible for violations at the Garland Road Landfill Superfund site in Miami County, Ohio, must provide an allowed general unsecured claim of $2,505,547 to the United States for estimated future oversight and past response costs incurred at the site, must provide an allowed general unsecured claim of $134,326 to the Ohio EPA for past response costs, and must make a cash payment of $6,732,895 to the Ohio EPA for remediation at the site.

In re Motors Liquidation Co., No. 09-50026 (REG) (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Dec. 14, 2010). A settling RCRA defendant responsible for violations at the Delphi Harrison Thermal Superfund site in Dayton, Ohio, must pay $5,329,343 to the Ohio EPA for remediation costs incurred at the site.

In re Motors Liquidation Co., No. 09-50026 (REG) (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Dec. 14, 2010). A settling RCRA defendant responsible for violations at the Delphi E&E Management Systems site in Anderson, Indiana, must make a cash payment of $3,599,039 to a trust for remediation at the site.

In re Motors Liquidation Co., No. 09-50026 (REG) (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Dec. 14, 2010). A settling CERCLA and RCRA defendant responsible for violations at the Wheeler Pit Superfund site in Rock County, Wisconsin, must provide an allowed general unsecured claim of $95,045 to the United States for response costs incurred at the site and must make a cash payment of $385,991 to Wisconsin for remediation.

In re Motors Liquidation Co., No. 09-50026 (REG) (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Dec. 14, 2010). A settling CERCLA and RCRA defendant responsible for violations at the GM AC Rochester Division site in Sioux City, Iowa, must pay $6,476,634 in U.S. remediation costs incurred at the site.

United States v. James Matteo & Sons, Inc., No. 1:10-cv-06405 (NLH-JS) (D.N.J. Dec. 9, 2010). A settling CERCLA defendant responsible for violations at the James Matteo & Sons, Inc. Superfund site in Gloucester County, New Jersey, must pay $820,000 in U.S. response costs incurred at the site.

United States v. Great American Financial Resources, Inc., No. 6:10-cv-01783 (M.D. Fla. Dec. 1, 2010). A settling CERCLA defendant responsible for violations at the Sprague Electric Company Superfund Alternative site in Longwood, Florida, must pay all past and future U.S. response costs incurred at the site.

United States v. Combined Development Co. I, LLC, No. 1:10-cv-853 (S.D. Ohio Dec. 3, 2010). Settling Residential Lead-Based Paint Hazard Reduction Act defendants that failed to make proper disclosures at housing units in or near Cincinnati, Ohio, must pay an administrative penalty of $7,500, must certify compliance with residential lead paint notification requirements, must submit a plan for replacement of all windows that are not certified lead-based paint free, and must abate lead-based paint hazards on friction and impact surfaces and stabilize other lead-based paint hazards.

United States v. NCR Corp., No. 10-C-910 (E.D. Wis. Dec. 1, 2010). Settling CERCLA defendants, Brown County, Green Bay, Wisconsin, and the United States, who are responsible for polychlorinated biphenyl contamination at the Lower Fox River and Green Bay Superfund site in northeastern Wisconsin, must pay a total of $5.2 million into a set of site-specific special accounts to finance future cleanup and natural resource restoration work at the site.

EPA entered into five proposed settlements under CERCLA that require the parties to pay U.S. response costs incurred at the Ward Transformer Superfund site in Raleigh, North Carolina.