Environmental Committee of the Florida Electric Power Coordinating Group, Inc. v. Environmental Protection Agency
The D.C. Circuit, 2-1, granted in part and denied in part petitions to review EPA's SIP call for 35 states and the District of Columbia. A group of about half these states as well as companies subject to those SIPs sued, arguing EPA misinterpreted its authority under the CAA when it called for SIPs ...
89 FR 16712
SIP Proposal: California (revisions concerning emissions of volatile organic compounds and nitrogen oxides from refinery flares).
89 FR 17285
SIP Approval: New Hampshire (reasonably available control technology requirements for PAK Solutions, LLC).
89 FR 17622
EPA revised its Risk Management Program under the CAA, including several changes and amplifications to the accident prevention program requirements, enhancements to the emergency preparedness requirements, and improvements to the public availability of chemical hazard information.
89 FR 16698
SIP Approval: California (revisions concerning ozone nonattainment requirements for controlling volatile organic compounds and nitrogen oxides from refinery flares).
89 FR 16496
SIP Proposal: Kentucky (revisions to definitions and incorporation by reference dates).
89 FR 16460
SIP Approval: Kentucky (revisions to rules regarding major stationary sources that are located within or have emissions that impact nonattainment areas, and revisions to nonattainment new source review planning requirements for the 2015 eight-hour ozone NAAQS in Jefferson County).
89 FR 15962
SIP Approval: California (nonattainment fees in the Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District).
89 FR 16202
EPA lowered the level of the primary annual fine particulate matter standard and finalized other key aspects related to the particulate matter NAAQS.