The court refuses to enjoin the filling of 200 acres of marshland bordering San Francisco Bay with refuse from San Francisco, although no EIS was filed with the 1973 Corps of Engineers permit authorizing the fill program. The filling operation is part of an ongoing project, begun in 1966, to create ...

A conditional building permit issued in 1969 by Seattle for the construction of a shoreside condominium is ruled invalid, and renewals of the permit in 1970 and 1971 combined with changes in its conditional status did not remedy the permit's nullity. Assuming the third renewal on Oct. 19, 1973, was ...

Article 1, §27 of the Pennsylvania Constitution, which makes the state a trustee of the public's natural resources with the duty to conserve the "natural, scenic, historic and esthetic values of the environment," is not self-executing, and the governor cannot seek injunctive relief against a privat...

Summary judgment is granted against the Department of Transportation and an injunction issued against further construction on an interstate highway interchange since plaintiff city was not afforded an opportunity to participate in a design hearing as required by §23 of the 1968 Federal Aid Highway ...

The Corps of Engineers did not abuse its discretion in denying a developer's application for a permit to fill submerged land for apartment building construction, and a lower court decision requiring the Corps to issue the permit is reversed. The district court erred in ruling that the proper standar...

The court upholds a grant of summary judgment for defendants and affirms the lower court's ruling that the EIS for a proposed highway segment adequately fulfills the requirements of NEPA even though it was prepared by the state high way department. The state agency consulted with federal agencies wh...

A lower court did not abuse its discretion by refusing to issue a preliminary injunction requiring strict NEPA compliance from an ongoing highway construction project. See 3 ELR 20303, for the district court's ruling that NEPA is applicable to the project but that an EIS is not required for certain ...

The Federal Power Commission has authority under the Federal Power Act to license the utilization of surplus water from federal impoundments by the six completed or proposed thermal electric power plants in the Four Corners area of the southwestern United States. The FPC does not have the power to l...

The court denies defendants' application for an interlocutory appeal from a lower court's ruling that in a challenge to the adequacy of a NEPA impact statement, the reviewing court is not limited to the administrative record, but may take additional evidence. The controlling authority on this point ...

The Third Circuit Court of Appeals lacks jurisdiction to review an AEC order denying a request for attorney fees and expert witness expenses by environmentalist intervenors in a license proceeding. The order is a collateral ruling in the course of the license proceeding and does not become final for...