Search Results
Use the filters on the left-hand side of this screen to refine the results further by topic or document type.

Proffitt v. Municipal Auth. of the Borough of Morrisville

The court holds that a plaintiff who prevailed in a Federal Water Pollution Control Act (FWPCA) citizen suit is entitled to reasonable attorney fees and costs. Although the municipality originally agreed in a consent decree to pay reasonable attorney fees and costs, the municipality subsequently arg...

Natural Resources Defense Council v. Texaco Ref. & Mktg.

The court holds that the citizen suit provision of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (FWPCA), §505, grants jurisdiction over suits alleging continuing permit violations at the same facility, even if not of the same specific permit parameters. The Supreme Court had held in Gwaltney of Smithfie...

Hurst v. United States

The court holds that a suit alleging that the Corps of Engineers negligently supervised the construction of two jetties in a river channel causing severe flooding of plaintiffs' property is not barred by the Federal Tort Claims Act's (FTCA's) discretionary function exception. The Corps issued a perm...

Kelley v. Thomas Solvent Co.

The court approves a partial consent decree under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Recovery Act (CERCLA), requiring a defendant at the Verona Well Field hazardous waste site in Battle Creek, Michigan, to reimburse the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the state of ...

O'Neil v. Picillo

The court holds that nonsettling hazardous waste generators are jointly and severally liable under Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) §107 for past cleanup costs not covered by settlement agreements and for future costs. Rhode Island had filed a CERCLA co...

United States v. McGraw-Edison Co.

The court holds that summary judgment is inappropriate in a settlement agreement for Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) response costs because the government raises genuine issues of material fact as to a 49 percent shareholder's involvement in company man...

Travelers Ins. Co. v. Waltham Indus. Lab. Corp.

The court holds that an insurance policy's pollution exclusion clause bars coverage of an insured company charged with violating state hazardous waste and water pollution laws. The insurance policy did not use the "sudden and accidental" standard found in many pollution exclusion clauses, but instea...

United States v. Rohm & Haas Co.

The court holds that a proposed de minimis consent decree under §122 (g) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) concerning claims by the United States and New Jersey for response costs at the Lipari landfill is fair and reasonable. The company that con...

United States v. Akzo Coatings of Am., Inc.

The court holds that a consent decree in an action under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) filed by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) against 12 potentially responsible parties does not violate state "applicable or relevant and appropriate req...

Public Interest Research Group of N.J. v. Powell Duffryn Terminals, Inc.

The court imposes a $3.205 million civil penalty in a Federal Water Pollution Control Act (FWPCA) citizen suit against a company for illegal and excessive discharges from its wastewater treatment plant. The court had previously determined that between 1977 and 1988, the bulk chemical storage and tra...