United States v. Eastman Chemical Resins, Inc., No. 2:23-cv-00867-MJH (W.D. Pa. May 24, 2023). Settling CWA, CAA, and RCRA defendants must perform injunctive relief, including conducting a third-party environmental audit, implementing effluent limit violations response requirements, performing facility specific work and repairs, completing comprehensive stormwater and groundwater control plans, and implementing a RCRA-based training program and daily inspection requirements; as well as pay a $2.4 million civil penalty in connection with alleged violations at a hydrocarbon resins manufacturing facility in Jefferson Hills, Pennsylvania.

EPA Region 9 proposed to reissue a general NPDES permit for water discharges from facilities classified as low threat located in the Navajo Nation.

EPA proposed to establish federal water quality standards (WQS) for Indian reservation waters that currently do not have WQS in effect under the CWA, with limited exceptions.

EPA entered into a proposed settlement agreement under the CWA and the APA in Center for Biological Diversity v. EPA, No. 21-71306 (9th Cir.), which would require the Agency to take specified steps with respect to implementation of the 2021 pesticide general permit (PGP), complete ESA consultation of the 2026 PGP, and propose for public comment certain changes to its monitoring and recordkeeping provisions.

EPA entered into a proposed settlement agreement under the CWA and the APA in Chesapeake Bay Foundation, Inc. v. U.S. EPA , No. 1:20-cv-2529 (D.D.C.), which would require the Agency to take steps regarding its oversight and funding of Pennsylvania’s efforts under its CWA programs to reduce nutrient and sediment discharges within the state’s portion of the Bay watershed and evaluate by the end of 2026 how each Bay state fared in meeting the 2025 Goal set forward in the last Chesapeake Bay Agreement.

United States v. Holyoke, Massachusetts, City of, No. 19-cv-10332-MGM (D. Mass. Mar. 22, 2023). A settling CWA defendant that discharged pollutants from unpermitted components of its sewer collection system to the Connecticut River must separate portions of the sewer collection system, upgrade certain elements of the combined sewer system, implement an illicit discharge detection and elimination program to address stormwater discharges, and pay a $50,000 civil penalty.

United States v. ABF Freight System, Inc., No. 2:23-cv-02039-PKH (W.D. Ark. Mar. 20, 2023). A settling CWA defendant must pay a civil penalty of $535,000 and implement compliance measures at all freight terminals currently operated nationwide (except in the state of Washington) in connection with alleged violations at nine freight terminals.

United States v. Gloucester, Massachusetts, City of, No. 1:23-cv-10505-LTS (D. Mass. Mar. 6, 2023). A settling CWA defendant must construct secondary sewage treatment upgrades by March 31, 2028, and comply with all effluent limits in the final permit by June 30, 2028, in connection with defendant's failure to meet certain effluent limits, based on secondary treatment standards, of the city’s water pollution control facility in violation of the final NPDES permit.

EPA Region 6 signed and issued the final NPDES general permit for discharges from hydrostatic testing of new and existing vessels in New Mexico, Oklahoma, and Indian country within the states of Texas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, and Louisiana.

EPA entered into a proposed consent decree under the CWA and APA in Cape Fear River Watch v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, No. 1:22-cv-03809 (D.D.C.), in connection with its alleged failure to perform duties mandated by the CWA to revise the effluent limitations guidelines and promulgate pretreatment standards for the meat and poultry products industrial category.