Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
H.R. 3055
Update Type
Issue
12
Volume
49
Update Issue
32
Update Volume
49
Congress Number
116
Congressional Record Number
165 Cong. Rec. S6311-22

which would make appropriations for the Department of Commerce, DOJ, FDA, DOI, EPA, and other related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2020, was passed by the Senate.

S. 2580
Update Type
Committee Name
Committee on Appropriations
Sponsor Name
Murkowski
Sponsor Party Affiliation
R-Alaska
Issue
11
Volume
49
Update Issue
28
Update Volume
49
Congress Number
116
Congressional Record Number
165 Cong. Rec. S5748

would make appropriations for DOI, EPA, and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2020.

S. 2580
Update Type
Committee Name
Committee on Appropriations
Committee Report
S. Rep. No. 116-123
Issue
11
Volume
49
Update Issue
28
Update Volume
49
Congress Number
116
Congressional Record Number
165 Cong. Rec. S5746

would make appropriations for DOI, EPA, and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2020.

EPA’s Existing Authority to Impose a Carbon “Tax”
Author
E. Donald Elliott
Author Bios (long)

E. Donald Elliott is Florence Rogatz Visiting Professor of Law, Yale Law School, and formerly EPA Assistant Administrator and General Counsel, 1989-1991. 

Date
October 2019
Volume
49
Issue
10
Page
10919
Type
Comment(s)
Summary

A number of bills have been introduced in recent years to put a price on carbon via a federal carbon tax. These proposals generally proceed from the implicit assumption that the federal government in general, and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in particular, does not already have such authority. That is incorrect. Under a federal statute that has been on the books since 1952, EPA could impose a carbon “tax” any time an administration in power is willing to do so. That is because a charge for using the public’s air to dispose of carbon dioxide and other wastes is technically not a tax, but rather a “user fee.” The confusion stems from a 1990 legal opinion written by the present author when he was EPA General Counsel, which ironically was intended to increase EPA’s use of tradable permits and other economic incentives to regulate pollution. It is time to set the record straight that EPA does have existing authority to impose a reasonable user fee on releases of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases, as well as other pollutants, any time that it has the political will to do so.

H.R. 3001
Update Type
Committee Name
Committee on Energy and Commerce, and Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure
Sponsor Name
Meng
Sponsor Party Affiliation
D-N.Y.
Issue
7
Volume
49
Update Issue
15
Update Volume
49
Congress Number
116
Congressional Record Number
165 Cong. Rec. H4163

would reestablish the Office of Noise Abatement and Control in EPA.

S. 1653
Update Type
Committee Name
Committee on Environment and Public Works
Sponsor Name
Sullivan
Sponsor Party Affiliation
R-Alaska
Issue
7
Volume
49
Update Issue
15
Update Volume
49
Congress Number
116
Congressional Record Number
165 Cong. Rec. S3105

would amend §3063 of Title 18, U.S. Code, concerning the powers of EPA.

You must be an ELI Member to access the full content.

You are not logged in. To access this content: