Search Results
Use the filters on the left-hand side of this screen to refine the results further by topic or document type.

Ag-Gag: The Unconstitutionality of Laws Restricting Undercover Investigations on Farms

In March 2012, Iowa and Utah passed “Ag-Gag” laws in response to a series of high-profile undercover investigations of farms by animal activists. The laws were framed as generally applicable fraud prohibitions. But their aim was clear: to stop animal activists exposing the treatment of animals on industrial-scale farms. A constitutional challenge to the laws now seems likely. A court hearing such a challenge should subject the Ag-Gag laws to heightened First Amendment scrutiny under the news gathering framework of Cohen v. Cowles Media Co. The laws cannot survive such scrutiny.

Where Standing Closes a Door, May Intervention Open a Window? Article III, Rule 24(a), and Climate Change Solutions

The Article III standing doctrine is hindering judicial resolution of climate change harms. Imposing Article III standing requirements onto movants seeking to intervene in ongoing cases further narrows an increasingly narrow field of options for litigants to engage federal courts in implementing climate change solutions. A flexible application of intervention rules, which would not require all prospective intervenors to demonstrate their own Article III standing, could support efforts to systematically address the large-scale problem of climate change.

Incorporating Environmental Law Into First-Year Research and Writing

In March 2010, I proposed to the Director of Legal Research and Writing and the Associate Dean for Academics that I offer a section of Research and Writing II, with a slight twist: I would cover the same writing and oral advocacy skills as other sections, but with an environmental law focus.

Congressional Wolf Delisting and the Erosion of the Separation-of- Powers Doctrine

The long legal fight over wolf reintroduction in the Northern Rocky Mountains came to a close in 2011, when Congress intervened in the ongoing court case by delisting the wolves through an appropriations bill rider. Though removal of Endangered Species Act protections by this method has exposed the Northern Rocky Mountain wolves to hunting, a deeper problem has been exposed in the doctrine of separation of powers between the legislative and judicial branches. The current approach essentially removes any barrier for Congress to meddle in ongoing court cases.

Illegal Fowl: A Survey of Municipal Laws Relating to Backyard Poultry and a Model Ordinance for Regulating City Chickens

As the movement toward keeping backyard chickens continues to grow, many cities are facing the decision of whether to allow residents to keep chickens and, if so, how to effectively regulate the practice. A survey of municipal ordinances in the top 100 most populous cities in the United States that concern keeping and raising chickens offers lessons that may be applied to designing a model ordinance. This survey reveals that chickens are, perhaps surprisingly, legal in the vast majority of large cities.

The Role of Philippine Courts in Establishing the Environmental Rule of Law

In 2010, the Philippine Supreme Court led the Philippines to become the first nation with rules of procedure specific to environmental cases. While the Philippines has made great strides in adopting environmental laws and providing access to courts, more work is needed to ensure consistent decisions and to build capacity in both lower courts and government agencies. As shown in the case of Metropolitan Manila Development Authority v.

Carbon Capture and Storage Program’s NEPA Compliance

NEPA is a legal tool that can be used to slow or prevent the development and use of energy in the United States. It is also a tool that can be used to help a federal agency make wise decisions and help prevent actions that damage the environment. Several NEPA requirements are related to the funding of carbon capture and storage (CCS) projects, and NEPA environmental impact statements for CCS projects may allow NEPA to aid the decisionmaking process. This Article focuses specifically on NEPA compliance by the U.S. Department of Energy and its National Energy Technology Laboratory.

Hybridizing Federal and State Regulation of Clean Taxis Introduction

For years, attempts by states and localities to regulate vehicular emissions have been thwarted by the Supreme Court’s environmental preemption doctrine. These preemption cases emphasize textual, plain-meaning interpretations of the Clean Air Act and the Energy Policy and Conservation Act, which facially preempt any state emission standard inconsistent with federal law.

Unpave a Parking Lot and Put Up a Paradise: Using Green Infrastructure and Ecosystem Services to Achieve Cost-Effective Compliance

Philadelphia has agreed to implement a long-term plan to employ ecosystem services provided by green stormwater control infrastructure to reduce combined sewer overflows and achieve compliance with the CWA. The $2.5 billion Green City, Clean Waters Program, to be implemented over 25 years as a part of the city’s larger “Greenworks” sustainability initiative, will save the city approximately $8 billion over traditional grey infrastructure.

The Water Marketing Solution

This Article suggests concrete solutions to promote the development of robust water markets. It begins with a review of water transfers in the western United States and historical water use patterns that help illuminate the problem. It then considers opportunities for moving agricultural water to urban use by studying successful water transfer systems. To those who know water allocation law, it will come as no surprise that many of these systems have evolved in the context of special purpose water districts and mutual ditch companies.