H.R. 7822
would protect clean air and public health by expanding fenceline and ambient air monitoring and access to air quality information for communities affected by air pollution, require immediate toxic air monitoring at the fenceline of facilities with pollution linked to local health threats, ensure the Environmental Protection Agency promulgates rules that require fenceline air monitoring in communities with air polluting industrial source categories, expand and strengthen the national ambient air quality monitoring network, and deploy air sensors in communities affected by air pollution.
S. 4369
would protect clean air and public health by expanding fenceline and ambient air monitoring and access to air quality information for communities affected by air pollution, require immediate toxic air monitoring at the fenceline of facilities with pollution linked to local health threats, ensure the Environmental Protection Agency promulgates rules that require fenceline air monitoring in communities with air polluting industrial source categories, expand and strengthen the national ambient air quality monitoring network, and deploy air sensors in communities affected by air pollution.
New York v. Environmental Protection Agency
Citizens for Pennsylvania's Future v. Wheeler
Environmental Protection Commission of Hillsborough County v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
Weymouth v. Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
Wheelabrator Baltimore, L.P. v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore
The Clean Air Act, Pigouvian Pricing, and Climate Governance
Two carbon pricing bills were introduced during the 115th Congress. Reps. Carlos Curbelo (R-Fla.) and Brian Fitzpatrick (R-Pa.) introduced the MARKET CHOICE Act during the summer of 2018. Reps. Ted Deutsch (D-Fla.) and Francis Rooney (R-Fla.) introduced the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (Energy Innovation Act) in November 2018, and reintroduced it early in the 116th Congress, where it presently has more than 65 cosponsors. By different methods and with different comprehensiveness, both of these bills place a Pigouvian tax on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Among other things, they are notable for attracting Republican cosponsors and amending the Clean Air Act (CAA) to temporarily suspend certain of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s authority over GHGs. This Comment analyzes the legal implications of the CAA amendments found in the Energy Innovation Act, and conducts a comparative evaluation of a selection of CAA programs vis-à-vis Pigouvian pricing.
H.R. 5113
would amend the CAA to reform the renewable fuel program.
You must be an ELI Member to access the full content.
You are not logged in. To access this content: