G.B. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
Clean Fuels Alliance America v. Environmental Protection Agency
How the Montreal Protocol Saved the World Twice and Could Do It Again
Solving a problem starts with defining it, and the climate emergency is no exception. Three concepts do the job: temperature, time, and tipping points. It’s too hot, and we have too little time before passing tipping points that are likely to be catastrophic and irreversible. The demand for stronger climate governance continues to grow and find new channels to flow through, including at the state and local levels. But if reducing CO2 is a necessary marathon, slashing short-lived climate pollutants is a sprint. The achievements of the Montreal Protocol and its 2016 Kigali Amendment demonstrate how quick and effective action is possible over some of these climate super pollutants.
S. Res. 559
would recognize that climate change is making wildfires more frequent, more intense, and more destructive.
S. Res. 558
would recognize that climate change-driven extreme weather events are increasing at the same time that the government is dismantling weather monitoring and alert systems.
S. Res. 557
would recognize that climate change portends a cascade of financial market collapses that would destabilize the national and global economies.
S. Res. 556
would recognize that Florida's insurance market is gravely stressed by climate risks.
S. Res. 555
would recognize that climate change poses a threat to the mortgage market and to home values.
You must be an ELI Member to access the full content.
You are not logged in. To access this content: