Energy (generally)
Crossed Wires and Split Circuits: Transmission Rights of First Refusal
Author
Alessandra Papa
Author Bios (long)

Alessandra Papa is a 2023 J.D. candidate at the University of Texas School of Law.

Date
May 2023
Volume
53
Issue
5
Page
10372
Type
Comment(s)
Summary

As population growth and increased electrification rapidly raise demand for power, U.S. electric grids are struggling to keep pace, and the need for more transmission capacity is pressing. The U.S. Congress has delegated its interstate commerce authority to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to regulate interstate transmission rates. Meanwhile, states regulate intrastate transmission rates. What is perhaps surprising, though, is the fact that states generally have authority over the siting and construction of interstate transmission lines. This complex division of jurisdiction means that states have a certain level of control over the future of interstate transmission, which can (and has) led to questions of exactly where a state’s authority ends. Some states have tested this boundary more than others—with mixed results. This Comment analyzes recent challenges to Minnesota and Texas laws that have led to a current circuit split as to the constitutionality of state restrictions on transmission buildout.

H.R. 2750
Update Type
Committee Name
Committee on Energy and Commerce
Sponsor Name
Castor
Sponsor Party Affiliation
D-Fla.
Issue
6
Volume
53
Update Issue
13
Update Volume
53
Congress Number
118
Congressional Record Number
169 Cong. Rec. H1907

would amend the Federal Power Act to authorize the allocation of the costs of certain interstate electric power transmission lines and electric power transmission lines that are located offshore.

H.R. 2749
Update Type
Committee Name
Committee on Energy and Commerce
Sponsor Name
Castor
Sponsor Party Affiliation
D-Fla.
Issue
6
Volume
53
Update Issue
13
Update Volume
53
Congress Number
118
Congressional Record Number
169 Cong. Rec. H1907

would facilitate the generation and delivery of power from affordable and reliable renewable generation projects and energy storage projects.

H.R. 2902
Update Type
Committee Name
Committee on Ways and Means
Sponsor Name
Perry
Sponsor Party Affiliation
R-Pa.
Issue
6
Volume
53
Update Issue
13
Update Volume
53
Congress Number
118
Congressional Record Number
169 Cong. Rec. H2048

would amend the Internal Revenue Code to repeal the alcohol fuels credit, the biodiesels fuel credit, the sustainable aviation fuel credit, the clean fuel production credit, and the alcohol fuel, biodiesel, and alternative fuel mixtures credit.

H.R. 2875
Update Type
Committee Name
Committee on Energy and Commerce
Sponsor Name
Balderson
Sponsor Party Affiliation
R-Ohio
Issue
6
Volume
53
Update Issue
13
Update Volume
53
Congress Number
118
Congressional Record Number
169 Cong. Rec. H2047

would direct the North American Electric Reliability Corporation, in consultation with the Secretary of Energy, FERC, Regional Transmission Organizations, and Independent System Operators, to submit a report to Congress on the reliability of the electric grid.

H.R. 2716
Update Type
Committee Name
Committees on Natural Resources and the Budget
Sponsor Name
Malliotakis
Sponsor Party Affiliation
R-N.Y.
Issue
6
Volume
53
Update Issue
12
Update Volume
53
Congress Number
118
Congressional Record Number
169 Cong. Rec. H1886

would distribute revenue from offshore wind projects in the New York Bight Area to certain coastal states, and promote conservation and workforce development.

H.R. 2488
Update Type
Committee Name
Committee on Ways and Means
Sponsor Name
Donalds
Sponsor Party Affiliation
R-Fla.
Issue
6
Volume
53
Update Issue
11
Update Volume
53
Congress Number
118
Congressional Record Number
169 Cong. Rec. H1707

would amend the Internal Revenue Code to make advanced nuclear facilities eligible for the qualifying advanced energy project credit.

You must be an ELI Member to access the full content.

You are not logged in. To access this content: