Energy (generally)
S. 1495
Update Type
Committee Name
Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry
Sponsor Name
Welch
Sponsor Party Affiliation
D-Vt.
Issue
7
Volume
53
Update Issue
14
Update Volume
53
Congress Number
118
Congressional Record Number
169 Cong. Rec. S1566

would require the Secretary of Agriculture to establish a program to provide support on the use of industrial heat pumps.

H.R. 2938
Update Type
Committee Name
Committees on Foreign Affairs, Energy and Commerce, Science, Space, and Technology, and Ways and Means
Sponsor Name
Donalds
Sponsor Party Affiliation
R-Fla.
Issue
6
Volume
53
Update Issue
13
Update Volume
53
Congress Number
118
Congressional Record Number
169 Cong. Rec. H2083

would facilitate the development of a whole-of-government strategy for nuclear cooperation and nuclear exports.

H. Res. 339
Update Type
Committee Name
Committee on Energy and Commerce
Sponsor Name
Newhouse
Sponsor Party Affiliation
R-Wash.
Issue
6
Volume
53
Update Issue
13
Update Volume
53
Congress Number
118
Congressional Record Number
169 Cong. Rec. H2118

would express the sense of the House of Representatives that an “all-of-the-above” energy strategy is the most viable approach to energy policy.

Crossed Wires and Split Circuits: Transmission Rights of First Refusal
Author
Alessandra Papa
Author Bios (long)

Alessandra Papa is a 2023 J.D. candidate at the University of Texas School of Law.

Date
May 2023
Volume
53
Issue
5
Page
10372
Type
Comment(s)
Summary

As population growth and increased electrification rapidly raise demand for power, U.S. electric grids are struggling to keep pace, and the need for more transmission capacity is pressing. The U.S. Congress has delegated its interstate commerce authority to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to regulate interstate transmission rates. Meanwhile, states regulate intrastate transmission rates. What is perhaps surprising, though, is the fact that states generally have authority over the siting and construction of interstate transmission lines. This complex division of jurisdiction means that states have a certain level of control over the future of interstate transmission, which can (and has) led to questions of exactly where a state’s authority ends. Some states have tested this boundary more than others—with mixed results. This Comment analyzes recent challenges to Minnesota and Texas laws that have led to a current circuit split as to the constitutionality of state restrictions on transmission buildout.

You must be an ELI Member to access the full content.

You are not logged in. To access this content: