The Third Circuit rules that a district court has the authority, pursuant to the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA), to order the past and present owners of a hazardous waste disposal site to fund a diagnostic study of the threat posed by contaminant...
The court upholds the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC's) decision not to prepare an environmental impact statement (EIS) before amending a New Jersey nuclear plant's license to allow additional storage of spent fuel at the plant. The court first determines that it must apply a reasonableness st...
The court invalidates in part the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) regulations governing nonferrous smelter orders (NSOs) under §119 of the Clean Air Act. An NSO allows the use of a combination of continuous emission controls and dispersion techniques to achieve the national ambient air qu...
The court affirms a district court ruling, 11 ELR 20780, upholding the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) decision not to prepare an environmental impact statement (EIS) concerning construction of a sewage treatment plant in Union County, North Carolina. The court rules that EPA did not act a...
The court declares that a county ordinance imposing licensing and inspection requirements and a taxing scheme on hazardous wastes transported through and disposed of within Boone County, Indiana, is unconstitutional and preempted by state law. The court rules that the ordinance places an undue burde...
The court permanently enjoins the Boone County Board of Commissioners from enforcing a local hazardous waste transportation and disposal ordinance that it held unconstitutional and in violation of state law, 12 ELR 21048.
Counsel are listed at 12 ELR 21048., full_html...
The courtrules that the offroad vehicle (ORV) route designation criteria in the California Desert Conservation Area Plan are inconsistent with regulations promulgated pursuant to the Federal Land Policy and Management Act (FLPMA) and two executive orders. The court first rules that several environme...
The court upholds a decision by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) not to prepare an environmental impact statement (EIS) concerning a decision to rehabilitate and convert to low-income housing an historic building in San Francisco as part of a redevelopment project funded by the ...
The court rules that three insurance companies are obligated to defend the holder of liability insurance policies against a class action for damages allegedly resulting from insured's contamination of well water. The court first tolds that the complaint in the groundwater pollution case generates a ...
The court holds that the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) is not required to prepare an environmental impact statement (EIS) before granting a permit for the construction of an inland coal-loading port. Although TVA's National Environmental Policy Act regulations indicate that port projects normally...