Search Results
Use the filters on the left-hand side of this screen to refine the results further by topic or document type.

Allegretti & Co. v. Imperial, County of

A court holds that a county did not effect a physical or regulatory taking when it imposed conditions on a landowner's permit to activate a well on its property. The conditional use permit limited the landowner from extracting no more than 12,000 acre/feet per year of water from the aquifer underlyi...

Benson v. California Coastal Comm'n

The court holds that a developer was not denied due process in connection with a local land use commission's hearing on his application for a coastal development permit. The developer claimed that telephone conversations with staff led him to believe that he did not need to appear at the hearing. Bu...

Miami-Dade County, Fla. v. United States

The court upholds a lower court decision that the United States has no obligation to reimburse a Florida county for the costs it incurred treating soil and groundwater contamination at the Miami International Air Depot. From 1943 to 1966, the U.S. government maintained and repaired U.S. Air Force ai...

Central Delta Water Agency v. Bureau of Reclamation

The court upholds the dismissal of local water agencies' claims that the Bureau of Reclamation (Bureau) was operating the Central Valley Project (CVP) in a manner that would at some point in the future violate the Vernalis salinity standard, a state standard with which the Bureau must comply in its ...

CDM Investors v. Travelers Cas. & Sur. Co.

The court affirms a lower court decision that under California law, an insurance company need not provide coverage for the costs property owners incurred responding to suspected soil and groundwater pollution. A state agency ordered the property owners to test their property after they were suspecte...

North Gualala Water Co. v. State Water Resources Control Bd.

The court holds that the state water control board did not err in ordering a water company to obtain a permit to pump groundwater from two wells near the North Fork Gualala River. The board has permitting jurisdiction over "subterranean streams flowing through known and definite channels." The board...

Marshall, City of v. Uncertain, City of

The court holds that while §11.122(b) of the Texas Water Code significantly restricts the issues that may be reviewed in a contested-case proceeding, it does not altogether preclude one when a proposed water rights amendment requests a change in use but does not seek to increase the amount of w...

In re Special Grand Jury 89-2

The court reverses and remands a lower court decision denying petitions brought by members of a federal grand jury empanelled to investigate possible environmental crimes at the Rocky Flats Nuclear Weapons Plant in Colorado. The petitions seek the release of certain documents and the lifting of thei...

Seagull Energy E&P, Inc. v. Eland Energy, Inc.

The court holds that the sale of an oil and gas working interest, which is subject to an operating agreement, does not release the seller from any further obligations to the operator. Despite selling its working interest, the seller remains liable under the operating agreement unless released by the...

Gilroy Citizens for Responsible Planning v. Gilroy, City of

A court upholds a city's approval of a construction project for a big box retail store. A citizens group argues that the city violated the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) by failing to comply with procedural requirements and by failing to include a study of certain adverse impacts and mi...