Search Results
Use the filters on the left-hand side of this screen to refine the results further by topic or document type.

Climate Action's Antitrust Paradox

An antitrust paradox lies at the heart of private-sector climate commitments. On the right, state attorneys general have warned that they may challenge these collaborations under antitrust laws. On the left, antitrust enforcers in the Biden Administration asserted that these actions will not receive preferential treatment even if they address societal ills that are not being addressed by governments. This Article asks what antitrust law is willing to consider: if prosocial goals are framed in terms of economic harms, should antitrust law view climate action as violating that standard?

Save the Colorado v. Semonite

A district court enjoined construction on a dam expansion project in Colorado in environmental groups' challenge to the Army Corps of Engineers' issuance of a dredge and fill permit. The court previously held the Corps failed to comply with the CWA and NEPA when it issued the permit. The court subse...

Sierra Club v. Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation

The Sixth Circuit denied environmental groups' petition to review the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation's (TDEC's) order issuing a water quality certification for a proposed fossil gas pipeline in Tennessee. The groups argued TDEC arbitrarily and capriciously determined that ...

Prescribed Fire in Wilderness Areas in a Post-Chevron World

In order to manage California wilderness areas to preserve their natural and untrammeled character, as required by the Wilderness Act, federal land management agencies should adopt interpretations of the Act that allow prescribed burning and Indigenous cultural burning in areas where it existed pre-colonialism.