A district court held that the DOE's March 2003 decision regarding the remediation of Area IV of the Santa Susana Field Laboratory in Simi Valley, California, violated NPA. DOE's decision to issue a FONSI rather than prepare an EIS was a clear error of judgment. The remediation is not categorically ...

A California appellate court held that a lower court erred in transferring environmental groups' California Environmental Quality Act claim to another venue. The groups filed suit challenging the certification of an environmental impact report for, and the decision approving the construction of, a t...

The D.C. Circuit set aside an FAA letter that changed the runway use procedures at Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport. Petitioners argued that the new procedures will route more jet aircraft onto two previously restricted runways, thereby increasing noise, soot, and exhaust fumes over r...

A New Mexico appellate court upheld the state's definition of "surface waters." In 2005, the New Mexico Water Quality Control Commission revised New Mexico's definition of surface water by eliminating language referring to interstate commerce to ensure that the state has plenary power within its bor...

A California appellate court reversed in part a lower court decision dismissing a consumer group's complaints against various hotels and retail establishments for secondhand smoke and tobacco exposure. The group alleged that the defendants violated California Proposition 65 by exposing individuals t...

The court held that a lower court properly denied power companies' motions to compel their insurer to pay all past and future defense costs incurred in responding to a federal lawsuit under the Clean Air Act. The underlying claim, brought by the federal government, three states, and several environm...

The court upheld a lower court decision dismissing a developer's appeal of a state administrative order directing him to remedy deficiencies in a dam and an associated detention basin in Naugatuck. The agency commissioner properly acted within his statutory authority in issuing the order. Prior to i...

The court held that a lower court improperly ordered the state wetlands commission to issue an inland wetlands permit to a developer. Although the record lacks substantial evidence to support the commission's denial of the developer's application, approving the application is not, as a matter of law...

The court, in a matter of first impression, held that an entity may be strictly liable under the New Jersey Spill Compensation and Control Act (Spill Act) for damages for the "loss of use" of natural resources adversely affected by its discharge of hazardous substances. The case arose after the stat...

A Minnesota appellate court held that an insurance company had no duty to defend or indemnify a pig owner in an underlying lawsuit brought by his neighbor claiming injury and damage from manure odors. The neighbor's complaint fell squarely within the insurance policy's pollution exclusion, which onl...