Search Results
Use the filters on the left-hand side of this screen to refine the results further by topic or document type.

Sierra Club v. Larson

The court affirms a district court ruling that ventilation buildings in plans for Boston's central artery/tunnel project, which will vent underground highway and tunnel automobile emissions, are indirect sources under the Clean Air Act (CAA), and not stationary sources subject to the Act's preconstr...

Sierra Club v. Robertson

The court affirms a district court's denial of a preliminary injunction that would have prevented the U.S. Forest Service from proceeding with two proposed timber sales in the Ouachita National Forest, and holds that an environmental group and the state of Arkansas lack standing to challenge the lan...

Smith v. U.S. Forest Serv.

The court affirms a district court decision upholding the U.S. Forest Service's (Forest Service's) refusal to consider classifying part of the Colville National Forest as wilderness before approving a timber sale, but reverses the district court's denial of an injunction barring the sale until the F...

SmithKline Beecham Corp. v. Rohm & Haas Co.

The court holds that the seller of an animal health products business is contractually liable to the purchaser of the business for Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) response costs attributable to the seller's conduct of the business. Under the purchase ag...

PUD No. 1 of Jefferson County v. Washington Dep't of Ecology

The Court holds that Washington State may include minimum stream flow requirements intended to protect migrating salmon and trout in a hydroelectric project's certification under §401 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (FWPCA) insofar as necessary to enforce a designated use contained in a ...

Steego v. Ravenal

The court denies motions for summary judgment on liability under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) of the son, grandchildren, and executors of the wills of past owners of the contaminated site of a Massachusetts manufacturing facility. The court first...

Steel Mfrs. Ass'n v. EPA

The court holds that the U.S.Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has authority under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) to regulate the land disposal of K061 electronic arc furnace dust and to set a treatment standard for zinc. EPA's K061 treatment rule establishes numerical treatme...