Search Results
Use the filters on the left-hand side of this screen to refine the results further by topic or document type.

United Technologies Corp. v. OSHA

The court holds that the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's amendments to its Hazard Communication Standard were not "promulgated" within the meaning of the Occupational Safety and Health Act until they were published in the Federal Register. The use of both "issued" and "promulgated" i...

Washington State Dep't of Game v. Interstate Commerce Comm'n

The court holds that the Interstate Commerce Commission permissibly interpreted §208 of the National Trails System Act Amendments of 1983 as conditioning rail-to-trail conversions on the negotiation of voluntary agreements between abandoning railroads and prospective interim trail users. The statut...

Woodland Private Study Group v. State

The court holds that an administrative order issued by the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) that limits the participation of potentially responsible parties (PRPs) in the development of remedial investigations/feasibility studies (RI/FSs) is not an intraagency statement exempt...

Dow Chem. Co. v. EPA

The court holds that an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Regional Administrator's interpretation in a letter of a federal regulation concerning vinyl chloride discharges is not final agency action for purposes of judicial review under the Clean Air Act. The court first holds that petitioner is ...

Chemical Waste Management, Inc. v. EPA

The court holds that plaintiffs have shown that the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) application of its 1985 off-site policy and the policy's codification in §121(d)(3) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) may be unconstitutionally vague. Th...

Idaho v. Hanna Mining Co.

The courtholds that Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) §107(f) requires a specific finding using the words "irreversible" and "irretrievable" to exempt natural resource damage from CERCLA liability, and that CERCLA §107(j) exempts from CERCLA liability n...

United States v. Washington

The court rules that the United States has not waived its sovereign immunity under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) for civil penalties imposed in state administrative proceedings. Before a claim for penalties can be assessed against the United States, it must clearly consent to be ...

Conner v. Burford

The court holds that the Bureau of Land Management and the Forest Service violated the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) by selling oil and gas leases on national forest land in Montana without preparing an environmental impact statement (EIS), and the sale of the leases without a comprehensi...

In re International Chem. Workers Union

The court holds that the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's (OSHA's) decision not to issue an emergency temporary standard (ETS) for cadmium pursuant to §6(c) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act was supported by the record. Although cadmium is known to cause kidney damage at high...

Coalition Against a Raised Expressway v. Dole

The court holds that the impacts from an elevated downtown expressway constitute "constructive use" of a historic city hall, a railroad terminal, and a park and therefore trigger the requirements of §4(f) of the Department of Transportation (DOT) Act. The court first holds that the failure of the F...