Search Results
Use the filters on the left-hand side of this screen to refine the results further by topic or document type.

Environmental Defense Fund v. Costle

Despite finding that the environmental impact statement (EIS) prepared by defendant failed to comply with the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the court denies plaintiff's request for injunctive relief against funding and construction of several sewage treatment faciliti...

ASARCO, Inc. v. EPA

The court holds invalid portions of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations that adopt the "bubble concept" for determining whether a modification in or addition to an existing plant is subject to new source performance standards under §111 of the Clean Air Act. According to this conc...

Fresno, County of v. Andrus

The court issues a preliminary injunction prohibiting the defendants from conducting further rulemaking proceedings to implement the acreage limitation provision of the federal reclamation laws until an environmental impact statement (EIS) has been prepared and filed. Defendants' proposed regulation...

Environmental Defense Fund v. Costle

The D.C. Circuit denies a petition to review the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) interim regulations implementing the Safe Drinking Water Act insofar as they relate to inorganic contaminants, but remands the record relating to organic contaminants for a report on whether the agency plans t...

Defenders of Wildlife v. Andrus

The court denies defendants' motion to dismiss this action to halt the killing of wolves by Alaska officials on federal lands. Defendants argued that the State of Alaska should have been joined as an indispensable party under Fed. R. Civ. P. 19 and that the action was barred by res judicata pursuant...

Gallegos v. State Bd. of Forestry

The court reverses the judgment of the trial court sustaining the Board of Forestry's granting of a timber harvesting permit to a private lumber company. At the outset, the court rejects plaintiffs' contentions that the Board inadequately explained the basis for its action and that the trial court e...

Ray v. Atlantic Richfield Co.

In a split decision, the Supreme Court affirms, for the most part, the ruling of a three-judge district court, 7 ELR 20071, that the state of Washington's Tanker Law is unconstitutional because of being preempted by federal law. The Tanker Law regulates oil tanker navigation in Puget Sound through p...

ASARCO, Inc. v. EPA

In a separate opinion, Judge MacKinnon dissents in part from the court's decision, 8 ELR 20164, that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is without authority under the Clean Air Act to use the "bubble concept" in applying new source performance standards to modifications at existing facilities...

Virginia Elec. & Power Co. v. NRC

The court affirms a Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) order imposing $32,500 in civil penalties against petitioner public utility for making seven material false statements in connection with its application for a license for its North Anna nuclear power plant by failing to inform the NRC of geolo...

D.C. Fed'n of Civic Ass'ns v. Adams

The Fourth Circuit affirms the district court's denial of injunctive relief in an action seeking to restrain further construction on a segment of an interstate highway for failure to comply with the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act. Plaintiffs' claims that the project environmen...