Search Results
Use the filters on the left-hand side of this screen to refine the results further by topic or document type.

Cooper Indus., Inc. v. Aviall Servs., Inc.

The U.S. Supreme Court holds that a private party voluntarily cleaning contaminated property may not sue to recover costs from a potentially responsible party (PRP) unless the private party had been sued or civilly compelled to clean the site under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensat...

Young v. United States

The Tenth Circuit held that owners of land adjacent to a Superfund site may not go forward with their cost-recovery action under §107 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act. The court below dismissed their claim because they were potentially responsible par...

Edison Elec. Inst. v. EPA

The D.C. Circuit denies a petition for review of the U.S. Environmental Protecton Agency's (EPA's) whole effluent toxicity (WET) tests for water quality. While EPA concedes that its WET tests do not incorporate every one of its usual criteria and procedures for ensuring the scientific validity of th...

Carabell v. Corps of Eng'rs

The Sixth Circuit upheld the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' (the Corps') denial of developers' application for a construction permit. Because the wetlands on the property are separated from a tributary of "waters of the United States" only by a man-made berm or barrier, they are considered "adjacent ...

Cape Hatteras Access Preservation Alliance v. Department of the Interior

A district court vacated and remanded the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's (FWS') designation of critical habitat in North Carolina for the wintering piper plover. The FWS may only designate occupied critical habitat in areas where the pertinent physical or biological features of the bird are curren...

American Canoe Ass'n v. City of Louisa Water & Sewer Comm'n

The Sixth Circuit reversed and remanded a lower court decision and held that two environmental groups have standing to bring suit against a city for violating its national pollutant discharge elimination system permit. The permit authorized limited discharges of effluent into a river and imposed mon...

Pakootas v. Teck Cominco Metals, Ltd.

A district court holds that a Canadian corporation that generated and disposed of hazardous substances directly into the Columbia River that were carried downstream into the waters of the United States must conduct a remedial investigation/feasibility study pursuant to a unilateral administrative or...

Sierra Club v. Seaboard Farms, Inc.

The Tenth Circuit held that §103 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), which sets out reporting requirements for the release of hazardous substances from farming facilities, does not require each individual barn, lagoon, and land application area...

United States v. Zenon-Encarnacion

The First Circuit vacated and remanded individuals' convictions for illegally entering waters designated by the U.S. Navy as a danger zone under 18 U.S.C. §1382 during a military training exercise. The Navy's national pollutant discharge elimination system permit was valid despite being denied ...