Search Results
Use the filters on the left-hand side of this screen to refine the results further by topic or document type.

The Collision of the Environment and Trade: The GATT Tuna/Dolphin Decision

Editors' Summary: On September 3, 1991, a three-member dispute resolution panel formed by the signatories to the General Agreements on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) held that a U.S. embargo on Mexican tuna and tuna products harvested in the Eastern Tropical Pacific Ocean violated GATT. The resulting controversy has focused on the decision's effect on U.S. actions under the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA), and the ramifications to other U.S. environmental laws with international trade impacts.

The "Regulatory Confusion" Defense to Environmental Penalties: Can You Beat the Rap?

Editors' Summary: Environmental regulations can be complex and confusing. Even sophisticated companies sometimes have trouble deciphering the regulations. A number of defendants have argued that environmental penalties should be reduced or eliminated when regulations are ambiguous or confusing. In the recent case of Rollins Environmental Services (NJ), Inc. v. EPA, the D.C. Circuit addressed this "regulatory confusion" defense. The court set aside a $ 25,000 penalty for violation of EPA's PCB regulations based on the ambiguity of the regulations.

CERCLA Contribution Protection: How Much Protection?

Editors' Summary: Congress, through the 1986 Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA), has succeeded in promoting CERCLA settlements between potentially responsible parties (PRPs) and the government. But the growing number of settlements have resulted in increased litigation between settling and nonsettling PRPs, in part due to uncertainties about SARA's contribution provisions. SARA clarified that settling PRPs may seek contribution from other liable parties, and obtain protection from contribution actions related to matters addressed in their settlements.

Contesting of CERCLA Costs by Responsible Parties—There Is No Contest

Editors' Summary: In recent years, fewer and fewer parties liable for Superfund site cleanup have successfully challenged the costs of cleanup reflected in claims made against them by the government. The government's burden in CERCLA cost recovery is to establish the amount of its response costs by a preponderance of the evidence. In this Article, the authors, who are U.S.

A Whole New Ballgame: Judicial Review and Estimation of CERCLA Claims in Bankruptcy

Editors' Summary: One of the lessons of recent Superfund litigation is that, in general, defendants unhappy with the government's cleanup plans face an uphill battle challenging those plans in court. Congress wrote the 1986 Superfund Amendments to favor a free hand for EPA in cleaning up hazardous waste sites, even if the cleanup bill will later be handed to a private defendant. Generally, this reflects Congress' policy preference for speedy cleanups.

Federal Wetlands Law: Part I

Editors' Summary: No single federal law comprehensively addresses wetlands protection. Rather, federal laws and regulations addressing activities and interests in wetlands have evolved with water law in general, and with other laws, such as those specifically targeting agriculture and coastal zone programs. The result is a complex federal regulatory structure that spreads jurisdiction among EPA, the Army Corps of Engineers, and other federal agencies.

Federal Wetlands Law: Part II

Editors' Summary: In this second of a three-part series on federal wetlands law, the author continues her comprehensive review of the current state of federal wetlands laws and regulations. The author first analyzes individual permits under the Clean Water Act § 404 program, including the application process, interagency consultations, the substantive standards for § 404 permits, and EPA's § 404(c) veto authority. She next covers enforcement mechanisms in the § 404 program, including administrative enforcement options and civil and criminal judicial enforcement.

The Water Resources Development Act of 1992: Expanding the "Corps of Environmental Engineers"

Editors' Summary: The Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (WRDA 92 or the Act), enacted on October 31, 1992, is an omnibus water projectauthorization and policy bill of the type traditionally used to authorize the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' (Corps') civil works projects. However, WRDA 92 differs from its predecessors by going farther in fostering a "greener," more "environmental" Corps. It authorizes more projects directly related to environmental protection and restoration, and signals Congress' growing inclination to use the Corps as environmental engineers.

Federal Oil Pollution Law and Regulatory Developments

Editors' Summary: Whether Congress intended it or not, the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (OPA) has shaken the entire oil exploration and production industry to its core. Precipitated by the Exxon Valdez oil spill, the Act represents Congress' decision to create a regulatory framework for preventing oil spills and for responding to actual or threatened discharges of oil into U.S. waters, and to change the historical limits on civil and criminal liability to a degree that will almost certainly cause some industry participants to discontinue doing business in the offshore area.