United States v. Kramer

ELR Citation: ELR 20856
No(s). s. 89-4340 (JBS), -4380 (JBS) (D.N.J. Oct 31, 1995)

The court holds that the unreasonableness, excessiveness, duplicativeness, impropriety, and non-cost-effectiveness of response costs are not defenses to a cost recovery action under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) if defendants fail to prove that su...

You must be an ELI Member to access the full content.

You are not logged in. To access this content: