Lingle v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.

ELR Citation: ELR 20106
No(s). 04-163 (U.S. May 23, 2005)

The Court held that the "substantially advances" formula, announced in Agins v. City of Tiburon, 447 U.S. 255, 10 ELR 20361 (1980), is not an appropriate test for determining whether a government regulation effects a Fifth Amendment taking. The "substantially advances" formula prescribes an inquiry ...

You must be an ELR subscriber to access the full content.

You are not logged in. To access this content: