International Surplus Lines Ins. Co. v. Anderson Dev. Co.

ELR Citation: ELR 21428
No(s). 87-2102 (6th Cir. May 7, 1990)

Following the precedent established by another panel, the court holds that emissions produced by an insured as byproducts of its production of curene 442 are not "sudden and accidental" under an insurance policy's pollution exclusion clause. The insurer thus has no duty to defend the insured.

Counsel for Plaintiff-Appellee
Bruce T. Wallace, Charles W. Borgsdorf
Hooper, Hathaway, Price, Beuche & Wallace
126 S. Main St., Ann Arbor MI 48104
(313) 662-4426

Counsel for Defendant-Appellant
Webb A. Smith, Charles E. Barbieri, Lynn K. Richardson
Foster, Swift, Collins & Smith
313 S. Washington Sq., Lansing MI 48933-2193
(517) 372-8050

Before WELLFORD and BOGGS, Circuit Judges; and McQUADE*, District Judge.

You must be an ELI Member to access the full content.

You are not logged in. To access this content: