Beazer E., Inc. v. Mead Corp.

ELR Citation: ELR 20001
No(s). 93-3372 (3d Cir. Sep 12, 1994)

The court holds that an agreement for the sale of a contaminated Alabama plant does not require the buyer's successor to indemnify the seller's successor for response costs it incurred under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) in cleaning up the site. T...

You must be an ELR subscriber to access the full content.

You are not logged in. To access this content: