Kāpa‘a v. Trump

ELR Citation: 55 ELR 20108
No(s). 25-00209 MWJS-WRP (D. Haw. Aug 8, 2025) (Smith, J.)

A district court granted summary judgment for cultural and environmental groups in a challenge to a letter NMFS sent to fishing permit holders informing them that commercial fishing was no longer prohibited in certain areas of the Pacific Islands Heritage Marine National Monument following a presidential proclamation. The groups argued NMFS violated the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act and the APA by failing to engage in notice-and-comment rulemaking before sending the letter. The court found the letter constituted final agency action because it created a safe harbor for commercial fishing operations by announcing a firm agency commitment to nonenforcement, and thus carried significant legal consequences. It further found NMFS chose not to advance an argument that the letter was an interpretive rule rather than a legislative one, and thus forfeited any argument that notice-and-comment procedures were unnecessary. It granted summary judgment for the groups and vacated the letter.

You must be an ELI Member to access the full content.

You are not logged in. To access this content: