No Mid-Currituck Bridge-Concerned Citizens and Visitors Opposed to the Mid-Currituck Bridge v. North Carolina Department of Transportation

ELR Citation: 53 ELR 20031
No(s). 22-1103 (4th Cir. Feb 23, 2023)

The Fourth Circuit affirmed summary judgment for the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) and FHwA in a challenge to their approval of a toll bridge across North Carolina's Currituck Sound that would connect the northern Outer Banks with the mainland. Environmental and community groups argued the agencies violated NEPA by failing to prepare a supplemental EIS and using traffic and development projections in their no-build alternative that improperly assumed a bridge would be built. The district court disagreed and granted summary judgment for the agencies. The appellate court found NCDOT and FHwA took a hard look at the new information the groups claimed had emerged—traffic forecasts, growth and development patterns, and sea-level projections—and reasonably determined they were not significant enough to justify a supplemental EIS; and that the agencies' decision to work backward from local land use plans to estimate the development that would occur without the bridge for purposes of the no-build alternative was reasonable. It affirmed summary judgment for the agencies.

You must be an ELI Member to access the full content.

You are not logged in. To access this content: