Murr v. Wisconsin

ELR Citation: 47 ELR 20082
No(s). 15–214 (U.S. Jun 23, 2017) (Kennedy, J.)

The Supreme Court, in a 5-3 decision, decided that the owners of a family cottage were not entitled to compensation over development regulations that bar the sale of the family's adjacent lot. The family wanted to sell the lot to finance an upgrade to their cottage, and argued that St. Croix County,...

You must be an ELR subscriber to access the full content.

You are not logged in. To access this content: