Carolina Casualty Insurance Co. v. Oahu Air Conditioning Service, Inc.

ELR Citation: 44 ELR 20027
No(s). 2:13-1378 (E.D. Cal. Jan 28, 2014) (Shubb, J.)

A district court held that an insurance company may go forward with its CERCLA claim against several refrigerator waste oil companies for reimbursement of payments it incurred following a hazardous waste spill by its insured. In Chubb Custom Insurance Co. v. Space Systems/Loral Inc., 710 F.3d 946, 43 ELR 20059 (9th Cir. 2013), the Ninth Circuit held that CERCLA requires the insured to make a claim to a potentially liable party before the insurer may bring a subrogation action under §112(c). Here, the insured made a "demand and claim" against the defendants for payment and reimbursement of the incurred expenses. The waste oil companies argued that this allegation is insufficient to show that the insured made a "formal claim," but neither case law nor the statute supports this conclusion. While Chubb held that the term "claimant" refers to "any person who presents a written demand for reimbursement of monetary costs . . . for a CERCLA violation" to a potentially liable party, it did not specify the precise form that a written claim for reimbursement must take. The court, therefore, denied the defendants' motion to dismiss. 

You must be an ELI Member to access the full content.

You are not logged in. To access this content: