H.R. 9283
would reform the process for listing a species as threatened or endangered under the ESA.
S. 4985
would reform the process for listing a species as threatened or endangered under the ESA.
Center for Biological Diversity v. Haaland
H.J. Res. 169
would provide for congressional disapproval under Chapter 8 of Title 5, U.S. Code, of the rule submitted by FWS relating to “Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Endangered Species Status With Critical Habitat for Guadalupe Fatmucket, Texas Fatmucket, Guadalupe Orb, Texas Pimpleback, Balcones Spike, and False Spike, and Threatened Species Status With Section 4(d) Rule and Critical Habitat for Texas Fawnsfoot.”
H.J. Res. 149
would provide for congressional disapproval under Chapter 8 of Title 5, U.S. Code, of the rule submitted by FWS relating to “Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Establishment of a Nonessential Experimental Population of Grizzly Bear in the North Cascades Ecosystem, Washington State.”
S.J. Res. 86
would provide for congressional disapproval under Chapter 8 of Title 5, U.S. Code, of the rule submitted by FWS relating to “Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Regulations for Interagency Cooperation.”
S.J. Res. 85
would provide for congressional disapproval under Chapter 8 of Title 5, U.S. Code, of the rule submitted by NMFS relating to “Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Listing Endangered and Threatened Species and Designating Critical Habitat.”
S.J. Res. 84
would provide for congressional disapproval under Chapter 8 of Title 5, U.S. Code, of the rule submitted by FWS relating to “Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Listing Endangered and Threatened Species and Designating Critical Habitat.”
You must be an ELI Member to access the full content.
You are not logged in. To access this content: