Center for Biological Diversity v. United States Fish and Wildlife Service
H.R. 1897
would amend the ESA to optimize conservation through resource prioritization, incentivize wildlife conservation on private lands, provide for greater incentives to recover listed species, create greater transparency and accountability in recovering listed species, streamline the permitting process, eliminate barriers to conservation, and restore congressional intent.
H.R. 1894
would amend the ESA to vest in the Secretary of the Interior functions under the Act with respect to species of fish that spawn in fresh or estuarine waters and migrate to ocean waters and species of fish that spawn in ocean waters and migrate to fresh or estuarine waters.
Center for Biological Diversity v. National Marine Fisheries Service
H.R. 1150
would amend the ESA to exclude certain populations of the lake sturgeon from the authority of the Act.
H.R. 845
would require the Secretary of the Interior to reissue regulations removing the gray wolf from the list of endangered and threatened wildlife under the ESA.
H.R. 840
would provide that the final rule of FWS titled "Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Endangered Species Status With Critical Habitat for Guadalupe Fatmucket, Texas Fatmucket, Guadalupe Orb, Texas Pimpleback, Balcones Spike, and False Spike, and Threatened Species Status With Section 4(d) Rule and Critical Habitat for Texas Fawnsfoot" shall have no force or effect.
S. 386
would amend the ESA to provide exemptions from the consultation requirements required under the Act for agency actions that fulfill critical human water needs.
South Carolina Coastal Conservation League v. United States Army Corps of Engineers
You must be an ELI Member to access the full content.
You are not logged in. To access this content: