As the World Burns: A Critique of the World Bank Group’s Energy Strategy

September 2013
Citation:
43
ELR 10760
Issue
9
Author
Nina Robertson, Bruce Rich, and Lynsey Gaudioso

The World Bank Group (WBG) is uniquely positioned to support the growth of developing countries in a way that decreases GHG emissions and provides energy to the poor. Historically, the institution has failed to fulfill this potential, supporting carbon-intensive energy projects and neglecting renewable energy, energy efficiency and pro-poor energy development. A recent comprehensive draft energy strategy and an energy sector “Directions” document propose some positive changes, but fall far short of reorienting the institution’s energy lending in critical ways. Major revisions are therefore required. First, the WBG should end its support for fossil fuels and focus its limited resources on energy efficiency, renewable energy, and universal energy access.

Nina Robertson is an attorney in the Environment and Natural Resources Division of the U.S. Department of Justice. Bruce Rich is a Visiting Scholar at the Environmental Law Institute (ELI). Lynsey Gaudioso is a J.D. candidate at Yale Law School and a former Research Associate of ELI.

You must be an ELR-The Environmental Law Reporter subscriber to download the full article.

You are not logged in. To access this content:

As the World Burns: A Critique of the World Bank Group’s Energy Strategy

SKU: article-80946 Price: $50.00