Time to Rethink the Supreme Court’s Interstate Waters Jurisprudence

October 2020
ELR 10840
Jamison E. Colburn

This October Term, the U.S. Supreme Court will be asked to weigh in on three and possibly all four of its pending original jurisdiction controversies over interstate waters. The Court’s past judgments and opinions have established little in the way of “federal common law” governing the states’ interests in shared waters. But they have established this much: these interests vest in states-as-states directly under the U.S. Constitution, even if the Court itself is reluctant to specify the interests with much precision or to enjoin violations thereof. Ultimately, and perhaps ironically, if it is states’ “equal dignity” that animates their interests in shared waters, it may be time for the Court to help other courts to adjudicate these interests through more ordinary channels than the extraordinary precincts of the Supreme Court’s original jurisdiction.

Jamison E. Colburn is Joseph H. Goldstein Faculty Scholar and Professor of Law at Penn State University.

You must be an ELR-The Environmental Law Reporter subscriber to download the full article.

You are not logged in. To access this content:

Time to Rethink the Supreme Court’s Interstate Waters Jurisprudence

SKU: article-301419 Price: $50.00