Regulating Greenhouse Gas Emissions From Existing Sources: Section 111(d) and State Equivalency

March 2012
Citation:
42
ELR 10206
Issue
3
Author
Jonas Monast, Tim Profeta, Brooks Rainey Pearson, and John Doyle

On December 9, 2011, the Nicholas Institute for Environmental Policy Solutions convened a broad range of stakeholders representing numerous viewpoints to explore  issues surrounding CAA §111(d), including options for states to demonstrate that existing GHG policies are equivalent to the §111(d) requirements. This Article builds upon the discussion during the December 9 workshop and considers some of the major challenges associated with categories of potentially “equivalent” state programs. Although setting the standard and deciding what level of detail to include in the guidance to the states is an important part of the §111(d) rulemaking, the goal of this Article is not to predict how the Agency will act or to offer an opinion as to how the Agency should act. Rather, the goal is to examine the options available for states to demonstrate
that existing GHG policies are equivalent to the §111(d) requirements, and the challenges that may face the states and the Agency regarding equivalency.

Jonas Monast is the Director of the Climate and Energy Program at the Nicholas Institute for Environmental Policy Solutions at Duke University. Tim Profeta is the Director of  the Nicholas Institute. Brooks Rainey Pearson is Policy Counsel for Climate and Energy at the Nicholas Institute. John Doyle is in his final year of a joint degree program pursuing a J.D. at Duke University School of Law and an M.A. in Environmental Science and Policy from Duke's Nicholas School of the Environment.

You must be an ELR-The Environmental Law Reporter subscriber to download the full article.

You are not logged in. To access this content:

Regulating Greenhouse Gas Emissions From Existing Sources: Section 111(d) and State Equivalency

SKU: article-26550 Price: $50.00