The last three Takings Clause decisions in the U.S. Supreme Court have shared a common theme. In each of them, the Court has cut through the morass of arbitrary, clause-specific rules, complications, and obstacles to relief that have accrued over the past few decades. I call this process “normalization”—treating Takings Clause claims as normal constitutional claims, subject to the same procedural, jurisdictional, and remedial principles that apply to other constitutional rights.