EPA and the Economy: Seeing Green?

March 2012
Citation:
42
ELR 10191
Issue
3
Author
John C. Cruden, Kenneth Green, Isaac Shapiro, Mary Neumayr, and Dick Morgenstern

Supporters of EPA note that the Agency is responsible for only 0.06% of the U.S. national debt and 0.26% of the federal government’s budget, and argue that cutting environmental spending could make our economy worse by increasing medical costs if the Agency lacks the resources to enforce laws that protect public health.  Opponents argue that the EPA regulatory process has exploded, creating so much red tape for businesses that they are unable to hire workers and stimulate our economy. On December 9, 2011, ELI convened a seminar to examine the effect of EPA on the economy and jobs. Expert panelists discussed the economic ramifications of EPA’s regulations, whether regulations create or kill jobs, and recent legislative attempts to increase congressional oversight and restrain EPA action.

John Cruden (moderator), is President of the Environmental Law Institute. Ken Green is a Resident Scholar at the American Enterprise Institutefor Public Policy Research. Richard Morgenstern is a Senior Fellow at Resources for the Future. Mary Neumayr is Senior Energy Counsel with the Committee on Energy and Commerce, U.S. House of Representatives. Isaac Shapiro is Director of Regulatory Policy Research at the Economic Policy Institute.

You must be an ELR-The Environmental Law Reporter subscriber to download the full article.

You are not logged in. To access this content:

EPA and the Economy: Seeing Green?

SKU: article-26548 Price: $50.00