Biotechnology and the Environment: Ethical and Cultural Considerations

November 1989
Citation:
19
ELR 10520
Issue
11
Author
Mark Sagoff

When the first human beings left the Garden of Eden, God told them to be fruitful, multiply, and cover the face of the earth. We might describe this event today as a major release of a novel organism from a containment facility. Imagine the environmental impact statement! How did God—or the angels He consulted—assess the risks? How did they weigh the benefits and costs?

Angels who wanted to protect the natural environment might have cautioned that Adam, Eve, and their descendants would alter irreversibly and, in that sense, damage nearly every ecological system. Other angels might have replied, however, that ecological change, even if drastic, is "harmful" only if it diminishes the welfare of human beings. These angels may have argued that the descendants of Adam and Eve should be free, therefore, to manipulate and transform nature—to domesticate it—to serve their interests and their profit. Otherwise, why did God give mankind dominion over the rest of creation?

Mark Sagoff, Ph.D., is a Senior Research Scholar at the Institute for Philosophy and Public Policy, University of Maryland at College Park.

You must be an ELR-The Environmental Law Reporter subscriber to download the full article.

You are not logged in. To access this content:

Biotechnology and the Environment: Ethical and Cultural Considerations

SKU: article-25758 Price: $50.00