3 ELR 10125 | Environmental Law Reporter | copyright © 1973 | All rights reserved
Article Analyzes State NEPA's
[3 ELR 10125]
In an article in this month's ELR,1 Nicholas C. Yost, Deputy Attorney General in charge of the Environmental Unit of the California Attorney General's office, reviews and analyzes state enactments parallelling NEPA. NEPA, he observes, reversed the pattern by which innovative ideas for environmental legislation are first adopted at the state level and later incorporated into federal law. Here, a novel federal law fathered equivalents in 18 jurisdictions, in most cases by legislation, but in a few states by administrative action.
Mr. Yost examines in detail first the declared policy and goals of the states' "little NEPA's and the extent to which the obligation to follow the state's environmental policy is made binding on state agencies and officials. Next, he analyzes the environmental impact statements which all state NEPAs require, examining their elements and scope. In some states, for example, an EIS is required for the activities of local governments as well as state agencies; in others, local governments are exempted. States also vary in the type of state agency action for which an EIS is required: a permit to a private developer to conduct environmentally harmful actions on privately owned land would necessitate an EIS in some states, but not in others. The author then studies state equivalents of the NEPA requirement that responsible federal officials consult with and obtain the comments of any agency with special responsibilities or expertise on the particular issue.
Last, Mr. Yost examines "state legislative departures from NEPA." He focuses primarily on the California Environmental Quality Act, as it was passed originally, interpreted by the courts, and subsequently amended. The author concludes that state "little NEPAs" are an important part of the original conception of NEPA, destined to have as significant an effect as the parent act on the national effort to preserve the environment. Readers of Mr. Yost's article will find useful the following chart of state NEPA equivalents, which updates the chart appearing at 2 ELR 10177.2
*4*States Enact Environmental |
*4*Protection Measures |
*4*(Round Two) |
| | Legislation |
| Constitutional | patterned | EIS |
State | Provisions | on the Michigan Act | Requirements |
Arizona | | | Game and Fish |
| | | Commission Policy of |
| | | July 2, 1971 |
California | | Cal. Code Civ. Pro. | Cal. Pub. Res. Code |
| | § 389.6 and § 641.2 | §§ 21000 et |
| | (Supp. 1972); Cal. | seq. (Supp. 1972) |
| | Gov't Code §§ 12600 |
| | et seq. |
Connecticut | | Conn. Gen. Stat. | Pub. Act. No. |
| | §§ 22a-1 et seq. | 73-562, approved |
| | (Supp. 1972-73) | June 22, 1973; Conn. |
| | | Executive Order No. |
| | | 16 (October 4, 1972) |
Delaware | | | Ch. 175, Vol. 58 |
| | | Laws of Del. (June |
| | | 28, 1971), adding 7 |
| | | Del. Code |
| | | §§ 7001 et seq. |
Florida | Fla. Const., Art. | Fla. Stat. § 403.412 |
| II, § 7, (effective | (Supp. 1971) |
| Nov. 5, 1968) |
Hawaii | | | Hawaii Executive |
| | | Order (Aug. 23, |
| | | 1971) |
Illinois | Ill. Const., art. |
| XI, §§ 1-2 (effective |
| July 1, 1971) |
Indiana | | Ind. Stat. Ann. | IC 1971, 13-10-1, |
| | §§ 3-3501 et seq. | added by P.L. 98, |
| | (Supp. 1971) | 1972, Ind. Stat. |
| | | Ann. § 35-5301 |
| | | et seq. |
Maryland | | | Ch. 702, Md. Laws |
| | | of 1973 |
Massachusetts | Mass. Const., art. | Ch. 732, Acts of | Ch. 781, Acts of |
| 97 of the Amendments | 1971, amended by Ch. | 1972, Ch. 30, |
| (effective Nov. 7, | 219, Acts of 1972 | § 61 et seq. |
| 1972) |
Michigan | Mich. Const., art | Mich. Comp. Laws | Mich. Executive |
| IV, § 52, (effective | Ann. §§ 691.120 et | Directive 1971-10, |
| Jan. 1, 1964) | seq. (Supp. 1971) | issued by the |
| | | Governor |
Minnesota | | Minn. Stat. |
| | §§ 116B.01 et seq. |
| | (Supp. 1972-73) |
Montana | Mont. Const., art. | | R. Code Mont. |
| II, § 3 (effective | | §§ 69-6501 et seq. |
| July 1, 1973) | | (Supp. 1971) |
Nevada | | | Ch. 311, Laws of |
| | | 1971, N.R.S. |
| | | § 704 |
New Mexico | | | N.M.S.A. §§ 12-20-1 |
| | | et seq. (Supp. 1971) |
New York | N.Y. Const., art. |
| XIV, § 4 (effective |
| Jan. 1, 1970) |
North Carolina | N.C. Const., art. | | N.C. Gen. Stat. |
| XIV, § 5 (effec- | | §§ 113A et seq. |
| tive July 1, 1973) | | (Supp. 1971) |
Pennsylvania | Penn. Const., art. |
| I, § 7 (effective |
| May 18, 1971) |
Rhode Island | R.I. Const., art. |
| I, § 17 (adopted |
| Nov. 3, 1970) |
South Dakota | | Ch. 144, S.D. Laws |
| | of 1973 |
Texas | | | Policy for the |
| | | Environment, |
| | | adopted |
| | | Jan. 1, 1973 |
Virginia | Va. Const., art. | | Ch. 384, Va. Laws |
| XI (effective | | of 1973 |
| July 1, 1971) |
Washington | | | Ch. 43.21C, RCW; Ch. |
| | | 47.04.100 |
| | | et seq., RCW |
Wisconsin | | | Ch. 274, Laws of |
| | | 1971, adding Wisc. |
| | | Stat. §§ 1.11 et |
| | | seq., Ch. 273, Laws |
| | | of 1971, adding |
| | | Wisc. Stat. § 23.11(5) |
Puerto Rico | | | 12 Laws P.R. Ann. |
| | | §§ 1121 et seq. |
| | | (Supp. 1972) |
1. Nicholas C. Yost, NEPA's Progeny: State Environmental Policy Acts, 3 ELR 50090 (Aug. 1973).
2. Comment, States Enact Environmental Protection Measures, 2 ELR 10177 (Aug. 1972).
3 ELR 10125 | Environmental Law Reporter | copyright © 1973 | All rights reserved
|